> MySQL and Postgres are larger than Sqlite by more than an order of magnitude. But they're still small, since you can run them on the smallest available cloud

> MySQL and Postgres are larger than Sqlite by more than an order of magnitude. But they're still small, since you can run them on the smallest available cloud VM's and have plenty of memory/CPU/disk left over for webserving. > What do you get in exchange for all those lines of code? Do you actually need the extra functionality? The ability to scale beyond a single webserver. It's just as easy to use Postgres as SQLite, but by choosing SQLite you've made life much more complicated for yourself if you ever need to scale to two servers. Why would you inflict that headache upon yourself?