5 ms·

I'm interested in what you're saying about classical business terms. Can you elaborate on that a little? I've always found these kinds of people hard to underst

I'm interested in what you're saying about classical business terms. Can you elaborate on that a little? I've always found these kinds of people hard to understand. The man has almost unlimited wealth and his motivations seem consistently petty and strange or just downright ludicrous. He's like an alien to me. I've noted the same feeling when seeing VCs/business people speak when I've encountered them.

kubb 2y ago
The classic business is about producing valuable economic outputs and creating a stable revenue flow from bringing them to market. The modern era post-business is about dipping into everyone’s pockets, by securing cash flow from the stock market and the government. Here building a profitable business model is less important than convincing people and the government to give you that dough. And the best way to do it is to have clout.
FergusArgyll 2y ago
> his motivations seem consistently petty and strange or just downright ludicrous. He's like an alien to me. I think it could help to try to think of a historical figure that has done impressive things but which you don't have an overly negative view of. A lot of them seem really weird or alien. In democracies, political leaders are (sometimes!) more "normal" because they have to get elected. So think of a CEO/Founder you like (Jobs?) or earlier people (Napoleon? I dunno, pick yours) Read a bio on them, they're pretty strange (I like Churchill, dude was wild). It seems that to do extraordinary things you need some traits that make you ludicrous. I don't really know, but it's definitely a pattern