2 ms·
It's basically about Price Elasticity. There must be some reason they don't say that up front. They state for meat burgers, its absent and for plant based subst
by ggm 2y ago
It's basically about Price Elasticity. There must be some reason they don't say that up front. They state for meat burgers, its absent and for plant based substitutes it's quite apparent.
Which means, alongside the finding when its a choice between meat and substitute people have a strong visible preference for meat, the substitutes have a double disadvantage: They cannot price as premium as easily without consequence.
Obviously, for vegans and others, there's a different tension here. But I suspect it goes to "eat something else" ie not the meat substitute.
Purely anecdatally, and unrelated, I actually enjoy many of these substitutes. They are however increasingly concerning me as exemplar ultra-high-processed foods. These are not good generally. They trigger bad gut-brain responses, they have different uptake, they use wierd 'not your grandmothers food' inputs. I am fine with eating Falafel or Hummus or Tempeh, and I think on the whole "meat substitute" is still a work in progress.
But those portabello mushroom burgers? They get stale (emotionally) fast. I'm over that.
They need to come up with a better label than "PBMA" - I think somebody needs to watch the red-v-blue episode about the "warthog" v "puma" thing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rju4RWdEyZk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rju4RWdEyZk
- PaulHoule 2y agoThe argument that plant-based foods are better for the environment also seems like a lie if they are more expensive. A major argument against meat is that you have to feed the animal several times more food than you get out of the animal, so it is more efficient to just eat the soybeans rather than eat the chicken or the cow. I mean, it's awfully hard to beat the economics of chicken, probably it is subsidized, beef has global warming potential from the methane that's not accounted for this way (though cattle can eat low quality feedstock that you can't eat and feeding back the manure on a small scale builds the soil.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_T._Odum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_T._Odum developed a flawed system of environmental accounting that tried to trace back all energy to the sun [1] that would try to account for all of the inputs that you could trace to the sun directly, and then figure that there was a certain "emergy/dollar" ratio for everything you can't account for in detail, with the corollary that anything you can't afford isn't ecological. [1] but it doesn't all come from there