4 ms·
I don't recall their name, they were a guest on the Root Causes podcast discussing PQ topics, though your summary varies from what I was trying to express. It's
by nemo 2y ago
I don't recall their name, they were a guest on the Root Causes podcast discussing PQ topics, though your summary varies from what I was trying to express. It's not that RSA will be classically broken, but that novel attacks to reduce factoring times of RSA key like batch attacks have a statistically significant chance of being discovered, that "further" was not meant to imply "completely broken classically," but "weakened further using classical approaches". Sounded plausible to me, though that's not a thing I'm any kind of domain expert in.
- tptacek 2y agoRight, batch attacks certainly threaten 1024 bit RSA, but, obviously, 2048 bit RSA is not just incrementally harder to break than 1024 bit RSA.
- oh_my_goodness 2y agoAnything specific at all would be helpful.
- nemo 2y agoSorry I'm busy, might have time to spend to look the podcast up in a day or two, but I don't think there's any actual value in that to anyone over an offhand comment so forgive me if I find other things to do instead.
- dadrian 2y agohttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/root-causes-408-takeaways-from-recent-conversations/id1455703066?i=1000663796648 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/root-causes-408-takeaw...