4 ms·
How can you claim to have evidence that apple applies it's rules equally based entirely off your own experience of the process? That makes no sense as an argume
by ktizo 14y ago
How can you claim to have evidence that apple applies it's rules equally based entirely off your own experience of the process? That makes no sense as an argument.
- click170 14y agoI think you misunderstood what was meant by 'Apple applies it's rules equally'. I read it to mean it was on a per submission basis not on a per submitter basis. Not that I readily agree given the anecdote just presented.
- ktizo 14y agoI read it that the claim was that apple applies it's rules equally, which in plain reading wouldn't differentiate between a per submission and per submitter interpretation as it would be applying the rules equally regardless. I was just meaning that if you were to go and try and find out whether apple were applying their rules reasonably equally, then you would need a lot more data than just the submissions of one individual, purely by the definition of what you are trying to research.
- nirvana 14y agoYour question sums up the entirety of what's wrong with hacker news. I'm the only one commenting here who has actual evidence of the situation, which I presented. You reject it because I talked only about my experiences, and my experiences go against your prejudice. Yet every other commeenter in this thread is making assertions, without providing any evidence what-so-ever. Often very broad assertions about how apple regularly censors. Your are blinded by your bigotry to the fact that those assertions are completely unsupported. And since Hacker News is overrrun with unthinking ideologically oriented people like you, no useful discussion can happen in these debates. > That makes no sense as an argument. You are so anti-intellectual you can't even recognize an argument. It is sad to see so many people who cannot think.
- ktizo 14y agoI like toast. Especially with jam and a nice cup of tea.