> This is different: the person in question isn't a government employee. The judge's daughter is a government employee, a policy advisor for an executive depar

> This is different: the person in question isn't a government employee. The judge's daughter is a government employee, a policy advisor for an executive department. There could be a worthwhile discussion about whether bringing further public attenion to a policy advisor is ethically on the same level as bringing further public attention to the identities of DOGE employees who raid the OMB and take unauthorized access of every American's SSN and other financial information (and then deliberately lie about whether the access is read-only). Personally, I think they're not on the same level. > It's also pretty clearly done to intimidate the judge, which is really not good. I wholeheartedly agree on this point.