It doesn't endanger any future legal cases to post stats from the database. Governments have done such audits before and it never caused any issues for prosecut

It doesn't endanger any future legal cases to post stats from the database. Governments have done such audits before and it never caused any issues for prosecution of specific cases. What we're discussing here is a bunch of tweets, not a legal case put before a judge. Musk is often throwing around the word fraud to mean something like "we were told the money would be spent on wells in Africa but it's actually being given to newspapers" and similar things which probably wouldn't be considered fraud in a courtroom, but people know what he means. I'm happy to double check specific claims, but I'm not sure what you're uncertain about. You're arguing that if you discover fraud you have to continuing giving the fraudsters money until the guy finally shows up in court? Or is found guilty? I don't quite know how or why I'd double check that because that's not how the law works and it would be silly if it did.