How can you spread all this misinformation? Do you believe it yourself? Yes, there has been companies trying to exploit the ocean for mining for as long as we

How can you spread all this misinformation? Do you believe it yourself? Yes, there has been companies trying to exploit the ocean for mining for as long as we have been traveling the seas. There has yet to be a successful attempt at it. Then a lovely apples to oranges comparison comparing primary energy of one country to electricity mix of another. Lets do the real comparison, the one you did not want to do because it does not show France is as a favorable light: Primary energy mix using the substitution method[1]: - France: 51% low carbon - Denmark: 43% low carbon Then we have electricity mix [2]: - France: 92% low carbon - Denmark: 88% low carbon France is wholly unable to build nuclear power as evidenced by the Flamanville 3 program being 7x over budget and 13 years late on a 5 year construction schedule. The EPR2 program is in absolute shambles due to the insane subsidies required, and now "hopefully" will reach an investment decision (i.e. the government decides on the subsidies) in 2026. We should keep our existing fleet of nuclear power as long as it is safe, needed and economical. But only someone with vested interest in the outcome of the nuclear industry would suggest wasting trillions of dollars on nuclear subsidies in 2025 given the state of renewables and storage. > No country that has invested in renewables has yet managed to get off fossil fuels while France invested in nuclear & nearly completely decarbonized. And the misinformation continues. When is France going to decarbonize the remaining 48% of their economy? [1]: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-energy-source-stacked?country=DNK~FRA https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-energy-source-... [2]: https://ember-energy.org/data/electricity-data-explorer/ https://ember-energy.org/data/electricity-data-explorer/