4 ms·
Another lie in the long list of lies from his mouth.
by aredox 2y ago
Another lie in the long list of lies from his mouth.
- alt227 2y agoHave you been on Twitter recently? 50% of it loves Musk, the other 50% openly hate him and abuse him. If what people on here are saying was true, those accounts publicly insulting him would be blocked by now.
- aredox 2y agoExcept that... They are? Of course not all of them, but those with enough reach or power to truly harm his reputation - such as journalists investigating him. He's not disappearing "Mark0394893838444" for saying "Musk is a dummy lol" but what does that proves? Meanwhile Musk has already banned the accounts of journalists for the crime of being too critical of him (on top of frivolous lawsuits clearly aimed at draining their money). The proof is not "how many people he hasn't banned" but "how many he has".
- alt227 2y ago> but what does that proves? That proves that its ok to criticise Musk on Twitter/X, which is what the OP was denying.
- immibis 2y agoAll the people he banned for criticizing him say otherwise.
- alt227 2y agoPeople keep saying this yet there are countless people on X critisizing Musk freely, so it must be fine to criticise Musk on X. I can provide examples and already have done. Can you?
- aredox 2y agoIf I pretend to be fine with people criticizing me, that claims fails as soon as I block/ban/throttle one (1) person for doing that.
- alt227 2y agoAs long as criticism was 100% the reason for the ban and can be proved it wasnt related to anything else at all.
- immibis 2y agoAn impossibly high bar. So we just take people at their word then?
- alt227 2y agoHow does the justice system work in figuring out these things?
- aredox 2y agoA nice dodge, given that Twitter is completely non-transparent as for the reasons of a ban - not to say anything about throttling/shadowbanning.