3 ms·
I don't want to start an argument or anything, but I honestly do not understand your take. If someone who loves and studies chocolate becomes, say, a bartender
by hug 2y ago
I don't want to start an argument or anything, but I honestly do not understand your take.
If someone who loves and studies chocolate becomes, say, a bartender, and makes a cocktail specifically for the tastes of people who love chocolate in the same way they do, it is not unreasonable for them to advertise their cocktail as a "cocktail for chocolate lovers".
Will it be an appealing cocktail for all chocolate lovers? Conceivably not. Some may like more cocoa or some like a more buttery finish, some may be teetotalers and not want a cocktail at all -- but does that make it inaccurate advertising, or badly phrased? Not really, in my opinion.
This guy who loves the internet made a colour palette that he feels will be appreciated by those who love the same things about the internet as he does. Seems like reasonable and perfectly well formulated english to me.
- tacitusarc 2y agoYour example is perfectly reasonable. There is a relationship between cocktails and chocolate, and you expressed what that relationship is: he is making cocktails specifically oriented at people who love the flavor of chocolate. When asked about the relationship between the color palette and the internet, his response failed to show any. He is not making an internet with colors, or colors with an internet, those are nonsensical statements. So in what sense is it for internet lovers? What characteristics of an “internet lover” would draw them to these colors? When another commenter asked a similar question, his response was, “it’s not that deep”