Well, that's news to me. I don't use consumer routers myself, but I know lots of folks who do. Now, I won't say that I go investigating their home networks, but

Well, that's news to me. I don't use consumer routers myself, but I know lots of folks who do. Now, I won't say that I go investigating their home networks, but IPv6 is rather prevalent among the discount ISPs where I live, and I know of at least two coworkers who have an IPv6 firewall by default with their router. Anyway, NAT is costlier than a firewall. It uses more memory, it requires rewriting packets on-the-fly, and typically if you're using embedded Linux (I'll assume that the vast majority of consumer devices for this are) then you're already using `iptables` or `nftables` to get NAT functionality. It is comparatively to set default inbound/forward drop policies. But yes, I should have said "in my experience," since it's true that I only know the networking equipment of a few people in a small country with limited IPv6 rollout (my ISP does not provide it).