2 ms·
I think they already had the 3.x kernel as a modular component, and it was of course smaller than 95 - remember that they had a floppy version of the Windows 95
by userbinator 2y ago
I think they already had the 3.x kernel as a modular component, and it was of course smaller than 95 - remember that they had a floppy version of the Windows 95 installation media (a dozen of them). It's well known that 3.x is small enough to boot and run from a floppy, but perhaps 95 was just a bit too big for that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39489748 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39489748
- zinekeller 2y agoAlso the 3.1 part is already designed to facilitate upgrades from Windows 3.1, which means that there is no need for debugging two paths (3.1 installer for the 3.1 upgrade path and the theoretical straight-to-95 brand-new installer).