3 ms·

> I’m not aware of the specific RFC’s du jour Funny way to say you don't know what you're talking about. If you don't know what technologies are actually out t

> I’m not aware of the specific RFC’s du jour Funny way to say you don't know what you're talking about. If you don't know what technologies are actually out there how can you say what is and is not possible? > but what percentage of users of the broader internet are actually running a router that supports this? Most who aren't running their own home rolled pf setup that can't be bothered to read about "the latest" (over a decade old) RFCs. And yeah, last I ran a UniFi gateway it supported PMP. That was several years ago. If it's a recent model device with halfway decent IPv6 support it's practically a sure thing it's got PMP support. Maybe disabled, but it supports it. Same with UPnP, might be disabled, but probably supported.

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
ninkendo 2y ago
I guess you really enjoy feeling superior so I’m just going to give you this one. You win. You’re very smart and you know more about router software than I do. (I’ll leave you to ponder whether this changes my point at all, but I don’t think it really matters. You seem to be pretty fixated on getting your digs in, so maybe we’ll just end the discussion here. Good day.)
- vel0city 2y ago
  > I guess you really enjoy feeling superior > Sick burn bro > My post was basically the biggest pile of sarcasm I could conjure and you still took it seriously, congratulations! > That’s cool for you, congratulations > not that that’ll stop you from inventing your own discussion > I don’t think I’ve met someone that truly thinks technological progress stopped in the 1990s and that URL’s and DNS are all we actually need. And yet you accuse me of ad homenims for pointing out your acknowledgement of not knowing of the last decade+ of networking tech and that I have a need to feel superior. Pot meet kettle buddy. You've spent so much effort telling me what's possible or not, berating me multiple times, while acknowledging you haven't kept up with decade+ old tech.

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

ninkendo 2y ago

I guess you really enjoy feeling superior so I’m just going to give you this one. You win. You’re very smart and you know more about router software than I do. (I’ll leave you to ponder whether this changes my point at all, but I don’t think it really matters. You seem to be pretty fixated on getting your digs in, so maybe we’ll just end the discussion here. Good day.)

vel0city 2y ago
> I guess you really enjoy feeling superior > Sick burn bro > My post was basically the biggest pile of sarcasm I could conjure and you still took it seriously, congratulations! > That’s cool for you, congratulations > not that that’ll stop you from inventing your own discussion > I don’t think I’ve met someone that truly thinks technological progress stopped in the 1990s and that URL’s and DNS are all we actually need. And yet you accuse me of ad homenims for pointing out your acknowledgement of not knowing of the last decade+ of networking tech and that I have a need to feel superior. Pot meet kettle buddy. You've spent so much effort telling me what's possible or not, berating me multiple times, while acknowledging you haven't kept up with decade+ old tech.