3 ms·

So your idea is to open up access so all the IT orgs that can't keep their systems secure ... ... which is ... virtually all of them ... get p0wned on a massi

So your idea is to open up access so all the IT orgs that can't keep their systems secure ... ... which is ... virtually all of them ... get p0wned on a massive scale? You know, now with AI powered assaults for extra special vulnerability levels... And then a magic wand happens, and the IT orgs that couldn't even install patches will be able to back-discover all the compromised hard drive firmwares, rootkits, and nth-level security holes after the fact? I get a NAT wall isn't perfect security. But pretending it is NO security is disingenuous.

afiori 2y ago
Not the parent but obviously no, but maybe if in the 90' it was the standard to not assume that the network was secure we would be in a better spot now (maybe a spot where company intranets use authentication instead of vpns
kstrauser 2y ago
Every company in spoken to in the last few years has been moving toward zero-trust network, where you assume that every single device is on a hostile network. There’s nothing inherently safe and secure about the corp network, so treat it as if all those cubicles were connecting in from Starbucks. IMO this is the only way forward.