4 ms·
This is quite the oversimplification of the value vs. costs of automated testing while also being completely orthogonal to the discussion. I'd never accept "aut
by lucisferre 14y ago
This is quite the oversimplification of the value vs. costs of automated testing while also being completely orthogonal to the discussion. I'd never accept "automated testing" by itself as a strong argument to prefer PHP or anything for that matter.
- Produce 14y agoI merely provided a rebuttal to the argument that PHP, or any other language, for that matter, is unreliable. I did not make the case that automated testing somehow makes PHP a preferred choice. How you test the code is what dictates reliability, not the language.
- lucisferre 14y agoI'm not sure how you can possibly separate the concept of a rebuttal from that of making an argument. And as I've alluded, how you test code does not, in fact, dictate any form of quality or reliability in and of itself. I suggest watching this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G77f9_tOSM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G77f9_tOSM Also reading this https://plus.google.com/u/0/104920553571646483561/posts/fmyZi1MxMgo https://plus.google.com/u/0/104920553571646483561/posts/fmyZ...