6 ms·
The safety net for everyone is your friends and family. Drug addiction destroys that, so you are left alone. They kind of don't have anyone else. People see hom
by bloomingkales 2y ago
The safety net for everyone is your friends and family. Drug addiction destroys that, so you are left alone. They kind of don't have anyone else. People see homelessness, but all I see is a slow trek to a suicide for many. They are dying slowly - and do not make any mistake about that. It's fatal.
Overall, there are many drugs addicts and homeless people in the world. It only bothers us when it obstructs our vision, very disgusting sentences like I cant even visit the beach anymore. I think that's fine, there are many beaches and many other places. You can visit the beach somewhere else, these people are dying.
Millionaire Rogan found the sight of homeless people unbearable so he had to leave the state (could be the taxes, but he's also filthy rich. I don't want to say he's just rotten, that's mean. I'll say a few other things instead).
Your society creates an inordinate amount of homeless people, that's first. Worry about the view later. You are lucky that you even get to see poverty up close, most just move the living fuck away from it.
Wait.
Edit:
I bring Rogan up because if you go through his entire catalog, you will see he has hours and hours of content that just bullies homeless people. He has done that to a few other groups, literal hours if you stack them side by side in a compilation. So there was already a lot of damage done in terms of mindshare by this media-arm.
- throwaway7783 2y agoTrivializing other people's concerns and worries is not the best way to get their help - even when priorities are pretty clear. It is very similar to trivializing "oh you shouldn't be an addict in the first place" We are dealing with humans here, and all of them, including the homeless and people complaining about views, make up our society.
- bloomingkales 2y agoAgain, I said a specific sentence, and I think it's the most important sentence to me. You have to be lucky to be witness to poverty, it provides incredible perspective. I undermine other's concerns about the unsightly view because I believe their attitude is immoral, and I have no issue drawing a red line there.
- ty6853 2y agoHaving been homeless a couple times the way out is rather simple in most cases if you're sane and sober. A days day labor is enough for food, propane, and bus passes for a week. Anything beyond that us enough to buy a shower at a truck stop and get cleaned up for an interview at a warehouse. You can trivially survive outside with a weeks day labor wages worth of REI gear on the coasts and most the lower 49 ( of course a junky would hawk this as soon as they are dope sick ) On both occasions I used this equation homeless -> day labor for Airbnb to clean up for warehouse/factory interview -> work in factory until deposit on apartment earned to get out. Most the people actually on the street are nuts or drugged out. People like me would clean construction site, then take a bus to edge of town and climb a flat roof and sleep where no one sees us. What you're witnessing isn't so much poverty but insanity.
- bloomingkales 2y ago[flagged]
- JumpCrisscross 2y agoYou're both talking past each other in a high-handed way that speaks perfectly to why this is a problem that's not only unsolved, but toxic to try and solve.
- ty6853 2y agoI'm not even sure it's a problem so much as a symptom. If you see someone with shortness of breath, normally offering some oxygen might help them. Unless of course they have COPD, in which case that may very well kill them.
- bloomingkales 2y ago[flagged]
- johnnyanmac 2y agoI can't even find work with experience and a clean record. I can't imagine how bad it'd be to find minimum wage work while not having an address to full a form out with. If it's been a whine for you it's gotten so much worse. >Most the people actually on the street are nuts or drugged out The most obvious, in your face example are the crazy ones. For basic human survival we remember those the most. But I bet most homeless people are just a person on the streets getting by. Not even the ones begging for change. It's a lot harder to get by in CA though.
- tdeck 2y agoThe thing is that being homeless is a constant state of emergency for homeless people and we don't talk about it like that. Imagine if someone spent their time complaining about how pulling over for an ambulance or firetruck made them late to an important life event, so we should stop doing that. I don't think most of us would say "hey wait a minute, this person has a genuine concern. Let's not trivialize it".
- presentation 2y agoI disagree with the idea that we should accept that homelessness and crippling drug addiction are socially acceptable and normal aspects of society just because the people going through them are suffering more than you are. I think it’s totally reasonable to express that the beach feeling dangerous and disgusting is in fact awful and that you do not like the state of things, and I do not want to live in a society where you can’t state opinions like this straightforwardly (which is why I left SF).
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- bloomingkales 2y agoCan I ask what you do on a regular basis to help homeless people? Was moving away your only actionable item? I don’t go out of my way to help the homeless either, but I also don’t go out of my way expressing how disgusted I am with them, or rally behind politics that are net bad for everyone just because I really agree that SF is really not to my liking. You moving away was the adult thing to do. You adding to the carrion call of maga voices is reprehensible. Enjoy your beaches.
- presentation 2y agoYou’re making a lot of assumptions. I am a liberal who believed at some point in my 20s when I lived there that what we needed to fix society’s problems is just to… empathize more. Unfortunately we see how far that gets, as there’s no shortage of “caring” in SF. I did not vote for Trump, and in fact I was active in SF local politics campaigning for politicians whose platforms I believed would make a real dent in the homelessness problem. Which you’re evidently not interested in doing besides admonishing people for not saying the politically correct thing. Unfortunately, San Franciscan home owners, when push comes to shove, want a pretty view, the image of a SF frozen how it was when they were young hippies, and inflated housing costs that they profit from, over actually solving any of these problems. Since then I’ve moved somewhere that prioritizes actually doing things that actually work, and not just feeling bad for people who are downtrodden. Enjoy your abject human misery and disgusting public spaces, I hope you feeling miserable somehow fixes the issue.
- nullc 2y agoThank you. I think what you're saying is particularly true on this subject-- the people with skeptical or negative remarks are likely people who they or their families have personally suffered harm. When someone denies your own experience it's natural to write them off if not to actively oppose their position. Widely contentious issues are usually contentious precisely because the different perspectives are all simultaneously valid.
- bloomingkales 2y ago[flagged]
- nullc 2y agoThanks for being frank. The reason it's a popular target is because it's such an embarrassment, denying it or diminishing it makes it more powerful as a war drum. It makes it more excusable for the drummers to exaggerate it, to the extent that the audience feels the alternative view is just flat out wrong. When there legitimately is no issue then it is what it is, when there is an issue and we can respond "we know, we're working on it, here are the difficulties we face" that's also understandable. But when a political opponent is committed to outright denying something that many people can see for themselves, that's manna from heaven. I think if you default to seeing things in terms of "alignment" it means that every time your opponent has a point, even a weak one, it harms all the positions that you've bundled together because it's a wedge for someone to go "well team yellow clearly has a point on X while team green is gaslighting, so ...". Especially when we generalize on one set of opinions to conclude the person we're talking to is 'the other team' and are according evil unpersons devoid of moral value. Every false positive on that judgement call sends another person in to the arms of people who don't jump to conclusions on them. To depower a political faction we must depower political factionalism -- because factions are primarily created by their opponents.
- bloomingkales 2y ago[dead]
- johnnyanmac 2y agoTo be frank, they never wanted to help to begin with. Why would I care about coddling their concerns if they are being selfish all this time? Sometimes, awareness is just as much about identifying who to not bother with as it is about empowering future allies.
- throwaway7783 2y agoWhere did the $640B+ that was spent to help the homeless came from? Thin air?
- lynx97 2y agoI find your way of downplaying the worries of other citizens way more disgustng then the comment you replied to can ever be. This "your problems are a joke" attitude is very condescending and patronising.
- bloomingkales 2y ago[flagged]
- lynx97 2y agoThe topic was homelessness. Where did you get the racist bit from? I am sorry for you, hope you get well soon and find some help.
- DangitBobby 2y ago> I am sorry for you, hope you get well soon and find some help. They clearly don't need "help", please do not concern troll here.
- lynx97 2y agoI was called a racist to my face. I chose to go the route of compassion, instead of throwing the same, useless energy back at them. And yes, I think people with such an aggressive style DO need help, it can't be healthy to think such toxic thoughts all the time.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- bloomingkales 2y agoYou got waxed, don’t even bother.
- lynx97 2y ago