2 ms·
>It seems more likely that people would trade in local currencies Use of local currencies is certainly on the rise, but the problem is lack of bilateral financ
by fuoqi 2y ago
>It seems more likely that people would trade in local currencies
Use of local currencies is certainly on the rise, but the problem is lack of bilateral financial trust caused by various factors, including capital controls. There is the recent example of Russian companies being unable to get rupee-denominated profits out of India, they had either to buy something from India or invest money there. China is also quite strict with its onshore RNB flows which is multiplied by risks of secondary US sanctions.
Honestly, I am really surprised that BRICS+ countries haven't yet developed a gold-based settlement system centered around central bank reserves. My main guess: such system would work fine with a more or less balanced trade, but many countries intentionally pursue the export-oriented model, which would work poorly with such system.
- throwaway290 2y agoBRICS currency will not happen because China holds all the cards while keeping RMB non convertible. It's a charade with the only goal to piss of US a bit
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> BRICS currency will not happen because China holds all the cards More than that, like half of the BRICS have threatened to shoot at or actually shot at each other in the last decade [1]. A BRICS currency is like America proposing a currency union with North Korea. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS Egypt & Ethiopia, UAE & Iran, India & China, et cetera