5 ms·
How Cook's Illustrated thrives while others are dying
- swilliams 18y agoLesson learned: People will pay for premium content, even on the Internet.
- adityakothadiya 18y agoThe question is - will they pay even in this struggling economy? My friend once told me, if economy starts getting worsened, she would cut down her premium expenses first. That includes branded products, luxurious lifestyle, premium subscriptions, etc. Yes, people pay for premium content but in this economy, businesses which are dependent on premium features will be the first ones who get setbacks. My $0.02s of course.
- jonknee 18y agoCooks Illustrated will probably just get bigger--cooking at home is cheaper than not and is one of those things people start doing when they want to save money.
- taw 18y agoCooking at home is expensive luxury. Measure how much it takes you to prepare a meal. Multiply by money you're paid for per hour. Add cost of ingredients, preparation and storage energy, cost of time to do shopping, gas used during shopping etc. There's pretty much no way this number is cheaper than ordering a take-away chop suey or a pizza.
- adityakothadiya 18y agoyou can cook at home by using free recipe sites as well. my point is, should we come up with business models for "premium" customers? I'm not saying it's not a good approach. Rather I'm researching such an idea which targets premium customers who prefer personalization/customization. And that's when my friend responded that she wouldn't pay for my premium service since there are free or cheaper options available, which also "get things done".
- revorad 18y agoYeah but the point here is that CI is charging for a quality service for which evidently there isn't an equally good free or cheaper option.
- icey 18y agoFood is an interesting topic. This is one of those times where I wish I had access to unlimited data; but I'm willing to bet that if there was a choice between buying more music on iTunes and cutting off a subscription to Cooks Illustrated, the iTunes goes first. People are hard-wired to think about food; since its right up there with shelter and procreation in terms of "things I need for survival". I can easily see people making justifications to keep paying for this sort of access until the bitter end of home budget cuts.
- tptacek 18y agoFirst, Cooks Illustrated is an incredible resource. I've been a subscriber for years, both in print and for the (indispensable) website that collects all their recipes. No CI recipe has ever failed me; most document in meticulous detail why each choice was made. Second, Cooks Illustrated may have the same editorial policy as Consumer Reports, but it's really not the Consumer Reports of food. 80% of their content is original research on recipes and techniques. At the end of each issue, they have 2 "Consumer Reports"-like sections, one on a piece of equipment and one on an ingredient. But that's a feature, not the engine. Third, in fairness, CI has other revenue streams: a lucrative line of cookbooks (several new ones are issued every year, and their flagship cookbook also goes through many editions) and 2 popular PBS television shows, which PBS stations pay them to run. Most magazines don't operate like this.
- callmeed 18y agoInteresting, I think I may subscribe. How is the photography in the online recipes?
- jonknee 18y agoThey are real big on illustrations (see article for example). There is a good amount of video on the site too, which is useful. You can sign up for a free trial period, though I do believe you gotta give up payment info first (and will be charged if you don't cancel before the trial is up).
- wallflower 18y agoI am a long-time subscriber. Cook's Illustrated almost makes cooking into a low-risk venture (especially when cooking for friends). My personal pot-luck guarantee/favorite: Teriyaki Stir-Fried Beef with Green Beans and Shiitakes. Subscribe to their email list just to read the Editor-in-Chief's emails - show how you can live on a farm and off the land if you provide value to people who don't live on a farm.. My one criticism is the recipes are not typically health friendly (you can adjust) and the fact that they keep on sending me 'subscribe' email spam for 'Cook's Country'.
- jonknee 18y agoI'm a subscriber to the website, it's a great product. I really enjoy the reviews. Recipe wise I usually look at what they and others do and then go my own.
- stcredzero 18y agoToo much choice sucks. Too much choice with too little information sucks even more. Consumer Reports and CI directly address this problem, and they do it fairly well. ConsumerLab is another one. They just test vitamins and dietary supplements and post their results on their website. http://www.consumerlab.com/ http://www.consumerlab.com/ The problem they address is not choice, but difficulty attaining of safety information. It's easy, for example, for metal impurities to get into supplements like DHEA. The FDA is not going to step in, so a free market alternative arises.
- nihilocrat 18y agoPeople will pay for quality. Why dumpster-dive for a free bag of not-actually-bad-but-they-had-to-throw-them-out potato chips when you can just walk in the store and buy them for a few bucks without getting your clothes dirty?
- wildwood 18y agoI wonder if the 'timelessness' of Cook's Illustrated will become more of an issue, as time goes on. Can they really keep coming up with a new Thanksgiving turkey recipe every single year? Or will they eventually end up competing with their own past content?
- jonknee 18y agoThat's silly. Will musicians run out of melodies? Or screen writers run out of stories? People have been cooking for thousands of years and somehow keep learning more. Food tastes are always changing, if you go back and watch old black and white Julia Child cooking shows she talks about a exotic herb called basil that you should definitely check out if you can find locally. Dried basil, the stuff that's hardly worth buying these days because fresh is so much better. Who knows what foods will seem commonplace in 50 years?
- likpok 18y agoYour comparison is an apt one. Both recipes and music are things we think of as infinite, but are not (Proof: you can encode all music/recipes/whatever as a finite series of 0's and 1's. Hence, there is a finite (and easily calculated) upper bound on the number of recipes shorter than a certain length.) Now, these representations are fairly long (and furthermore, music can't be made much shorter), so there are a fair number of variations. In conclusion: Yes, they will run out someday. However, this may be after the heat-death of the universe. A bigger risk to their business model is humanity changing to not need food.
- nihaar 18y agoFunny, I was referred to this magazine by a friend today as well. I agree, at a time when I do want to cook at home more, I am willing to pay the small premium to actually read quality recipes and techniques rather than free sites that provide a hack-job of recipes like allrecipes.com or cooks.com
- augustus 18y agoI am a recent cook-for-relaxation person. Going through their web site, the main differentiation factor is the tried-and-true recipe factor. Apparently they try each recipe 30-40 times to perfect it. That is worth paying for. And the convenience of the Internet and the videos. I could easily go to the library and pick up a book but it is a time consuming process. So, yeah. If they want to take the time to perfect each recipe. Heck, I will pay for it.
- jderick 18y agoIt's just that good, that's how.
- mdakin 18y ago"Cooks Illustrated" is great but I prefer the recipes from their other site/magazine "Cooks Country." You might want to check out CC before subscribing to CI in case your palate is similar to my own.
- gommm 18y agoAfter reading this, I tried to become member to their website and they force me to chose a state even if I least my country as france and ask me for a phone number to be formatted according to the way americans format their phone numbers. I guess they don't get that many foreigners using their website....