2 ms·
There is often an implied criticism of "if its not under active development for features, its not good" - which I don't agree with (and obviously neither do the
by ggm 2y ago
There is often an implied criticism of "if its not under active development for features, its not good" - which I don't agree with (and obviously neither do the VIM maintainers I think)
Maintenance mode is a good place to be IMO. I don't think anyone looking at a codebase with this maturity should feel "why aren't there significant new feature updates".
Wayland, ok I can see there are things which need 'bring into the modern era' but I don't think either Wayland, or XDG represents a massive about-face or fork moment. (I don't use graphically aided editors either vi or emacs, I live in terminal emulated space)
The moment of fear is when it ceases to be brought into current packaging by the distributions which re-factor it. I don't see any sign of that happening either.
- MisterKent 2y agoDefinitely true, probably of almost everything. Rarely the case, and rarely acknowledged, but almost everything is a tool. If everything followed the Unix principle rather than trying to constantly grow and pivot, we would have a lot more solutions that just work. The more often people think about things as tools under the Unix principle, the (generally) less user hostile they are.