4 ms·
-Wconversion , no? My point isn't that you exhaust all the features of Rust with a better stdlib and "debugger-oriented programming" -- my point is that you ca
by mjburgess 2y ago
-Wconversion , no?
My point isn't that you exhaust all the features of Rust with a better stdlib and "debugger-oriented programming" -- my point is that you can get 95% of the way there with trivial complexity costs.
Rust imposes significant program design costs which can be very detrimental to otherwise trivial performant memory management, to faster iteration of software design, and so on. These aren't free lang. features.