2 ms·
> UPnP/STUN is still possible with NAT/CGNAT You should tell that to my ISP, they’ve managed to deploy a CGNAT that’s proven to be completely STUN proof. The o
by avianlyric 2y ago
> UPnP/STUN is still possible with NAT/CGNAT
You should tell that to my ISP, they’ve managed to deploy a CGNAT that’s proven to be completely STUN proof. The only way I can achieve any kind of P2P comms is using IPv6. IPv4 is useless for anything except strictly outbound connections.
> and you're going to need something like that even if there were no NAT, so to me it sounds like a bit of a wash, at least to the end-user.
Not in my case. As above, I simply can bust my ISPs CGNAT, so IPv6 is invaluable to me. Makes a huge difference to me, the end-user.