> it's config format can't be worse than nginx's. It's alright — the main upside for me is that it supports parameterized includes, thus letting you reuse larg

> it's config format can't be worse than nginx's. It's alright — the main upside for me is that it supports parameterized includes, thus letting you reuse large chunks of configuration without relying on something like ansible or bash + envsubst. https://caddyserver.com/docs/caddyfile/directives/import https://caddyserver.com/docs/caddyfile/directives/import