18 ms·
> you will only be able to get a solution of the form 2 ± ϵ for some arbitrarily small ϵ The problem with that from a UX perspective is that you won't even get
by zozbot234 2y ago
> you will only be able to get a solution of the form 2 ± ϵ for some arbitrarily small ϵ
The problem with that from a UX perspective is that you won't even get to write out the first digit of the solution because you can never decide whether it should be 1.999...999something (which truncates to 1.99) or 2.000...000something (which truncates to 2.00). This is a well-known peculiarity of "exact" real computation and is basically one especially relevant case of the 'Table-maker's dilemma' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding#Table-maker%27s_dilemma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding#Table-maker%27s_dilem...
- jostylr 2y agoIf one embraces rational intervals throughout, they can be the computational foundation and the ux could have the option of displaying the interval for the complete truth or, to gain an intuitive sense, pick a number in the interval to display, such as the median or mediant. Presumably this would be a a user choice in any given context.