3 ms·
This RMG survey reports 19% of all voters knowing what DOGE was in December of 2024. https://napolitannews.org/posts/19-percent-of-voters-know-what-doge-is htt
by someothherguyy 2y ago
This RMG survey reports 19% of all voters knowing what DOGE was in December of 2024.
https://napolitannews.org/posts/19-percent-of-voters-know-what-doge-is https://napolitannews.org/posts/19-percent-of-voters-know-wh...
(PDF) https://napolitannews.org/assets/pdfs/67633dc0cced7-gcm24-1209-mini-toplines-doge.pdf https://napolitannews.org/assets/pdfs/67633dc0cced7-gcm24-12...
- ty6853 2y agoLess than 19% knew what the nuclear safety team was, so be careful with the point you're making. There was probably more informed consent for DOGE than many eliminated positions.
- Hasu 2y agoYou're moving the goalposts. People did not, in fact, vote for DOGE.
- ty6853 2y agoI said 'the public voted for someone openly stating they'd carry out DOGE.' They moved the goalposts to what fraction of voters were questionably polled to know about DOGE, because my claim is pretty much irrefutable. Then when I use their own criteria suddenly we cry foul that I used their own goal posts that they shifted to.
- confidantlake 2y agoYou are single handedly making this discussion unbearable. Congrats I guess?
- someothherguyy 2y ago> so be careful with the point you're making I was attempting to find evidence for your claim, and I found that survey. If you can find other surveys, please share, as I am seeing this being repeated a lot.
- ty6853 2y agoYou were finding evidence for a different goal post you shifted to, that when applied applies even more harshly to the nuclear team.
- lgdiva 2y agoShut up, Jesus Christ...
- confidantlake 2y agoThe dude is insufferable.
- specialist 2y agoI don't follow. Is there a constituency in favor of eliminating governmental nuclear safety?
- ty6853 2y agoI don't follow. Are we moving the goal posts yet again from the above of what % knew what something was? Because the constituency generally did not know of the nuclear safety team. I don't even know their was a constituency calling for their creation, although there is an argument as to why reps might make them exist anyway. Are you suggesting their creation was improper? Or suggesting constituency advocation would make it proper? Either way you might draw uncomfortable conclusions.