3 ms·

What?

• refurb 2y ago
  > That included staff who are stationed at facilities where the weapons are built, according to CNN. This sentence in the article is referring to who was fired, not who the source was.
  • alimw 2y ago
    I am perfectly capable of making sense of the article. It's you that I struggle with. At the time this exchange began, that was the only reference to CNN in the article. As I recall most of the rest was attributed to NBC.
    • refurb 2y ago
      The actual source was CNN. Which is the focus of this discussion.
      • deleted 2y ago
        [deleted]
      • alimw 2y ago
        The BBC article has been rewritten since yesterday, but remains clear that it draws on more than one source. That’s already enough to conclude that your attempt to “do your own research” fell at the first hurdle.