3 ms·
No, that’s the claim of the source on who was fired. Which may be true, but being true doesn’t make the headline true (I.e. the people fired at the facility co
by refurb 2y ago
No, that’s the claim of the source on who was fired.
Which may be true, but being true doesn’t make the headline true (I.e. the people fired at the facility could be secretaries and other support staff).
- alimw 2y agoWhat?
- refurb 2y ago> That included staff who are stationed at facilities where the weapons are built, according to CNN. This sentence in the article is referring to who was fired, not who the source was.
- alimw 2y agoI am perfectly capable of making sense of the article. It's you that I struggle with. At the time this exchange began, that was the only reference to CNN in the article. As I recall most of the rest was attributed to NBC.
- refurb 2y agoThe actual source was CNN. Which is the focus of this discussion.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- alimw 2y agoThe BBC article has been rewritten since yesterday, but remains clear that it draws on more than one source. That’s already enough to conclude that your attempt to “do your own research” fell at the first hurdle.