3 ms·
> Why carry on doing that for so long? They weren't actually losing money. If you read further, it turns out that the channel was profitable thanks to video sp
by jsnell 2y ago
> Why carry on doing that for so long?
They weren't actually losing money. If you read further, it turns out that the channel was profitable thanks to video sponsorships.
- reassess_blind 2y agoRight, but a penny saved is a penny earned and this could’ve been profitable if she hadn’t set the production quality bar so high (food stylist?) from the jump.