2 ms·
I think it comes down to that emacs itself has facilities for managing the background processes, and eshell in general tends to defer back to the surrounding ed
by cmrdporcupine 2y ago
I think it comes down to that emacs itself has facilities for managing the background processes, and eshell in general tends to defer back to the surrounding editor for a lot of functionality.
So if there's an "emacs" way of doing things, generally eshell delegates to that, instead of rolling its own.