3 ms·
Is there a problem with this if it's not trademarked? It's like saying Apple Maps is the nth product called "Maps". I, for one, am glad they are standardising
by exclipy 2y ago
Is there a problem with this if it's not trademarked? It's like saying Apple Maps is the nth product called "Maps".
I, for one, am glad they are standardising on naming of equivalent products and wish they would do it more (eg. "reasoning" vs "thinking", "advanced voice mode" vs "live")
- anon373839 2y agoNot a trademark lawyer, but I don’t think Deep Research qualifies for trademark protection because it is “merely descriptive” of the product’s features. The only way to get a trademark like that is through “acquired distinctiveness”, but that takes 5 years of exclusive use and all these competitors will make that route impossible.