Respectfully, I think you are deliberately refusing to acknowledge the thoroughly sound logical arguments I've put forward about the true consequences of what y

Respectfully, I think you are deliberately refusing to acknowledge the thoroughly sound logical arguments I've put forward about the true consequences of what you're proposing. >Your thinking itself is simplistic and child-like. You see in black and white (no pun intended), so are incapable of reasoning about complexity in the world or having a discussion that involves nuance; I recognize that historical race relations create a complex emotional landscape for people who are similar in appearance to oppressed people in the past. But that is part of life. We need to move forward and not create more problems by taking from the innocent to prop up non-victims. >You don't follow humor or irony. It appears to be completely lost on you. I'm sure you'd reply defensively with some commentary on the quality of the humor but, of course, that would miss the point too. I didn't detect any humor in your writing, besides the original snarky comment that started this. And just because it's snarky doesn't mean that you don't mean to actually insinuate awful things about people. >You are transparent without being aware of it. As far as I'm concerned, a majority of people blaming white people for everything are hucksters. But there are quite a few misguided souls who truly bought the lie that there's a huge scheme out there to oppress them because of what they look like. There are always a few racists in the world, but at this point I think most of them (even in our "majority white" country) are not white. >But, your subsequent replies have been of even poorer quality than I could have imagined, and increasingly so. Take care. I imagine you have been drinking this whole time and you're at the bottom of the bottle now and really losing your grip on reality. Take care.