4 ms·
> When you elect to take more three pointers you necessarily have to resort to shooting more difficult ones, which lowers the expected return on each one But t
by Xenoamorphous 2y ago
> When you elect to take more three pointers you necessarily have to resort to shooting more difficult ones, which lowers the expected return on each one
But then 2 pointers become easier. You can’t defend tightly both the perimeter and the paint at the same time. Sounds like a win-win. Again, nobody seemingly noticed.
- relaxing 2y agoDo you watch NBA games?
- HDThoreaun 2y agoHe is right. The highest volume shooting teams play 5 out which leads to easy layups as well.
- relaxing 2y agoAnd help defense exists to counter it. Meanwhile Denver won it all with some of the lowest volume of threes in the league.
- HDThoreaun 2y agoYou can try to counter it but go ahead and look at the highest volume 3 point shooting teams and compare them to the highest volume layup teams. Part of it is that theyre following analytics so theyre looking for layups more than other teams but gravity is very real and does make it easier to get layups when you shoot more 3s.
- relaxing 2y agoI know spacing the floor is real. The point is it’s not the only winning strategy and basketball is in no way “solved”.