3 ms·
>Should get paid? Or should clean it up? The entity who caused the pollution should be responsible for paying to clean it up. For logistical purposes it might
by gruez 2y ago
>Should get paid? Or should clean it up?
The entity who caused the pollution should be responsible for paying to clean it up. For logistical purposes it might make sense to tax at the point of production/sale rather than actual emission, eg. taxes at gas stations rather than some sort of monitoring system on every car.
> The problem is this is energy and resources that could be spent on actually solving the problem at its source instead of finding ways to maintain the status quo.
If the alternatives are actually cheaper, the market will naturally work itself out, because polluters would be incentivized to switch. Nobody uses plastic utensils in place of reusable ones, not because the government banned them, but because everyone knows the latter are so much cheaper.
- sweeter 2y agoYou literally can't just "clean it up" it's not possible. This is there American hyper-individualistic mindset at work. The problem and solution is cut and dry, anything else is a comfortable lie.
- gruez 2y ago>You literally can't just "clean it up" it's not possible. explain? at least with carbon since it's fungible and global it's probably the easiest to clean up, compared to exxon trying to clean an oil spill or whatever.