4 ms·
There's a book called "I Want A Better Catastrophe", which is about the role of hope in climate activism. (It's a little uneven, but interesting to see the brea
by smallerfish 2y ago
There's a book called "I Want A Better Catastrophe", which is about the role of hope in climate activism. (It's a little uneven, but interesting to see the breadth of perspectives from the people he talks to in the climate space).
One doomer he speaks to expects us to hit 6 degrees (which is also apparently backed up by one of the IPCC climate scientists he talks to), and describes the scenario this way:
* By 2050, we're expecting to hit a global population level of 10 billion
* By 2150, the carrying capacity of the planet (given degraded food production capacities, etc, in the 6 degree scenario) will be 2 billion
* Imagine what that century would be like to live through
2.5 degrees is obviously a much "less worse" scenario, hence the title of the book.
Another book along the same lines is "Ministry of the Future", also quite uneven, but an interesting enough read.
I think it's important to be non-avoidant and really contemplate what the higher-degree scenarios would look like, since we're clearly heading in that direction.
- trescenzi 2y agoI struggle with this recommendation. I am anything but non avoidant. I’ve gone vegan, I rarely drive, I know that mass famine, immigration and war are highly likely before I die. Realistically people like me cannot make change. I question the value of continuing to soak myself in the understanding that there is a strong chance the future will be shit. I recently abandoned a reread of Parable of the Sower. I don’t need a reminder of what’s possible. Would a better catastrophe cause people to take things seriously? Honestly after covid I doubt it.