5 ms·

There are people who take Wikipedia or Russia Today as a source of unbiased truth Can't change lazy people

• iamnotagenius 2y ago
  Wikipedia or even Russia today is not advertised to be a source of unbiased truth.
  • mdp2021 2y ago
    You may be interested to know that some extremist biased guts-be-more-dignified-than-cortex outlets around the world are named "The Truth" (I follow the press from many places). The failure of education in teaching Critical Thinking around the world is massive. It would be a good idea to focus on how to exploit LLMs to improve the situation. Also because, given the situation, the same "forces" that promote viscerality shamelessly naming it "The Truth" could have the opposite idea about chatbots and similar areas, exploiting them in their direction...
  • me_me_me 2y ago
    And LLMs are advertised as such?
    • iamnotagenius 2y ago
      Well there is general perception of being "advertised as such" from those who push LLMs and keep hyping them up as "PhD level performing" systems.
      • me_me_me 2y ago
        [flagged]
        • iamnotagenius 2y ago
          [flagged]
          • me_me_me 2y ago
            [flagged]
            • iamnotagenius 2y ago
              [flagged]
              • me_me_me 2y ago
                [flagged]
                • iamnotagenius 2y ago
                  [flagged]
                  • me_me_me 2y ago
                    [flagged]
                    • iamnotagenius 2y ago
                      [flagged]
                      • me_me_me 2y ago
                        [flagged]
                        • iamnotagenius 2y ago
                          [flagged]
• xtracto 2y ago
  Or worse... think of what a lot of extremists in the middle east take as truth! It's writings waaaaay older than the Wikipedia.
  • Ma8ee 2y ago
    You don’t have to go as far as the Middle East. A significant part of the US electorate takes the Bible as true.