It’s possible for reasonable arguments to exist that support either side of the pet transactionality dilemma. What often happens is that people have their own p

It’s possible for reasonable arguments to exist that support either side of the pet transactionality dilemma. What often happens is that people have their own personal biases that cause them to pick a side. But would you consider a group of people to not be intelligent specifically because individuals that make it up cannot agree on a single answer?