3 ms·
I prompted ChatGPT on separate sessions with: 1. Cats are transactional 2. Dogs are transactional 3. Cats are not transactional 4. Dogs are not transactional
by hbarka 2y ago
I prompted ChatGPT on separate sessions with:
1. Cats are transactional
2. Dogs are transactional
3. Cats are not transactional
4. Dogs are not transactional
It agreed on all occasions. Language is agreeable.
- exitb 2y agoIt’s possible for reasonable arguments to exist that support either side of the pet transactionality dilemma. What often happens is that people have their own personal biases that cause them to pick a side. But would you consider a group of people to not be intelligent specifically because individuals that make it up cannot agree on a single answer?
- dkersten 2y agoI just tried it with 4o and it disagrees with me giving reasons, and even elaborates when I pushed back. It basically said cats are transactional to an extent, in terms of basic needs, but that beyond that, they aren’t. And for dogs, flat out disagreed, saying they aren’t not transactional. Reversing the statements in a new untainted chat didn’t alter the responses — ChatGPT remained consistent.
- monicaaa 2y ago[dead]