3 ms·
Oh yes? What glee you appear to exhibit at the thought of 150 odd million people being thrown in to turmoil. As if that’s going to be a good thing for Europe.
by TheSpiceIsLife 2y ago
Oh yes? What glee you appear to exhibit at the thought of 150 odd million people being thrown in to turmoil.
As if that’s going to be a good thing for Europe. Or anyone for that matter. Russia accounts for something like one third of global fertiliser production.
And, I mean, I can think of nothing better than a massive power vacuum in a state that has the most nuclear weapons in the world. Wile party, if you can get an invite. I suppose.
Imagine if, like, your opinion was wrong, or, let’s say, there turns out to be unintended consequences to the outcome you desire. Because there always is. The road to hell and all of that.
Then what?
- watwut 2y agoEurope needs Russia to collapse just like they needed nazi to collapse. Noncollapsed Russia will start wars. Non collapsed Russia is actively trying to destroy democracies in Europe even as they did not sent troops yet.
- TheSpiceIsLife 2y agoRussia collapses and then what? A hot war between The Axis of China and NATO Co. & Sons? Trump & Xi Jinping divi up the lands and build The Great Wall of Russia. Fun to watch from afar, maybe. War is good for profit.
- watwut 2y agoRussia does not collapse, Trump and Russia dividing Ukraine. Then Russia expanding further.taking over Hungary and Slovakia who will give up instantly. Then Russia attacking Poland, Czech Republic, Austria, German and Europe having war in home. There is about zero good future with non collapsed Russia who is in addition supported by USA. Russia will expand, until it collapses. And there will always be a war where they want to go next.
- skinkestek 2y ago> Oh yes? What glee you appear to exhibit at the thought of 150 odd million people being thrown in to turmoil. Please specify exactly where this glee is supposed to be apparent. I was originally only saying that I think there is going to be a big economic upswing in Ukraine when russia collapses. But since you seem interested: As for russia, that is just sad. I'm one of those who used to study russian back when the iron curtain fell. But in the choice between: - russia inevitably collapsing and utterly destroying other countries along with it - and russia inevitably collapsing and only for a limited time damaging other countries in the process I take the last one. Edit: As for the nuclear weapons, we can probably make a new Budapest Memorandum and russia can give the nuclear warheads to China as payments. It worked so well with Ukraine. Can't see any problems with that /s
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- TheSpiceIsLife 2y ago> take advantage of what I see as an almost inevitable economic boom as soon as russia collapses I read that as something you’re looking forward to. Happy to be corrected.
- skinkestek 2y agoLate but it is not something I look forward to. I probably have more Russian friends and ex-colleagues than most people, although that doesn't prevent me from being extremely clear about the situation being caused by russia. I'd much rather take advantage of Russia stabilizing and becoming a major trade partner to Europe. That was my original motivation for trying to learn Russian 20-30 years ago. (Trying to understand where the misunderstanding come from and I am starting to wonder if I misuse the expression "take advantage of". I've always thought there was a difference between "taking advantage of <someone>" which I thought was always bad and "taking advantage of <something>" which I thought could be good or bad depending on the situation. If I have misunderstood, then apologies for the confusion.
- TheSpiceIsLife 2y agoThanks for clearing that up.
- pllbnk 2y agoIn the name of security of Europe. Russia collapsing won't mean the land disappears with its resources. It means more opportunity and happiness.
- tim333 2y ago>russia collapses... Then what? Ideally they could get a normal government rather than the current murderous dictatorship.
- TheSpiceIsLife 2y agoState collapse followed by improvement in quality of life? I can think of maybe three examples in living memory versus, what, three hundred that didn’t work out so well.