3 ms·
What's your point? The paper you're linking does not include the analysis the post you're responding to is asking for.
by nimih 2y ago
What's your point? The paper you're linking does not include the analysis the post you're responding to is asking for.
- gymbeaux 2y agoIt does give some insight into what you seek, at least. For example, “We find that for smallern≲262144, JesseSort is slower than Python’s default sort.” I’d like to see a much larger n but the charts in the research paper aren’t really selling JesseSort. I think as more and more “sorts” come out, they all get more niche. JesseSort might be good for a particular dataset size and ordering/randomness but from what I see, we shouldn’t be replacing the default Python sorting algorithm.