4 ms·
> they are even content with 10% Doesn't sound like it when they constantly go suing the heck out of competitors - not for their money but for excluding them o
by blinkingled 14y ago
> they are even content with 10%
Doesn't sound like it when they constantly go suing the heck out of competitors - not for their money but for excluding them out of the marketplace. Microsoft at least allows competition to exist if they pay up reasonably.
- headShrinker 14y agoThe competition to which you refer, in this context was proven in the court of law to have infriged on Apple's copyrights. Thus the suit. Apple allows plently of competition when they aren't blatently stealing.
- sanxiyn 14y agoInfringed Apple's copyrights? Citation needed. I thought it was patents?
- blinkingled 14y agoBoth the UK and German courts said no to Apple trying to ban Samsung products. Only in the USA where Apple can manage to patent anything ridiculous are they gaining some traction with their injunctions. If you manage to patent so much that no one else can make another phone or tablet it speaks again about them wanting to totally obliterate the competition. The fact that they are allowed to do so is another, separate issue but what Apple is pulling isn't anything near being content.
- tedunangst 14y agoSamsung is competing for the same 10%. Apple would be happy if Samsung made a different device for a different market.