3 ms·
Probably, the results in the table are about 7 years old. For example, the table shows version 1.3.4 for zstd, which indicates that the results are outdated - c
by pella 2y ago
Probably, the results in the table are about 7 years old. For example, the table shows version 1.3.4 for zstd, which indicates that the results are outdated - currently, version 1.5.6 is the latest release
( https://github.com/facebook/zstd/releases/tag/v1.5.6 https://github.com/facebook/zstd/releases/tag/v1.5.6 )
In my opinion, it is better to check the original repository: https://github.com/inikep/lzbench https://github.com/inikep/lzbench
or this:
https://github.com/inikep/lzbench/blob/master/doc/lzbench20_sorted.md https://github.com/inikep/lzbench/blob/master/doc/lzbench20_...
- orthoxerox 2y agoJudging by the last link, the only options that are strictly superior to snappy in every sense are lz4 (as OP claimed) and zstd (levels -3 to +1). If compression speed is critical, then the default level of zstd compression in most big data tools (+3) might be the wrong one for you, but test on your own data, not Silesia.