3 ms·
That appears to be the null hypothesis at this point. It's up to you to provide evidence to the contrary, ideally in the form of an election that doesn't resul
by CamperBob2 2y ago
That appears to be the null hypothesis at this point. It's up to you to provide evidence to the contrary, ideally in the form of an election that doesn't result in RFK as HHS secretary and Tulsi Gabbard as DNI.
- lazyeye 2y ago(shrugs) the majority of people voted for this. Why is their opinion of less value than yours?
- CamperBob2 2y agoSimple self-preservation, if nothing else. Stupid voters constitute a threat to my own well-being, and probably to yours as well. Again: I'm not the one with questions to answer and propositions to prove.
- lazyeye 2y agook but whatever is going inside your head has no relevance to me or anyone else. And the fact that you feel "threatened" maybe more related to your propensity for being influenced by ideology and the bubble you live in, than anything happening in reality.