3 ms·

It would really be the end of the amateur exhibitionist community there though. This is already under heavy pressure from all the OnlyFans teasers. But hopeful

It would really be the end of the amateur exhibitionist community there though. This is already under heavy pressure from all the OnlyFans teasers. But hopefully some of them will find their way to Lemmynsfw. Ps for what it's worth I used to actually subscribe to Reddit. When it was called Reddit gold. But at some point they more than doubled the price and gave you crap tokens to give away to other people. I didn't want to do that and didn't want to pay so much so I quit. I think they can get a lot more subscribers if they just lowered the price somewhat.

stevenicr 2y ago
1st ddg result shows /post/151 and that page is a cloudflare 504 gateway timeout page. Maybe too many people have already discovered it.
- wkat4242 2y ago
  It's working fine, https://lemmynsfw.com/ https://lemmynsfw.com/ (note: obviously very NSFW!) Maybe they are blocking crawlers or something.
dannyphantom 2y ago
Do you remember when buying Reddit gold gave you a coupon to buy beef jerky on that one website? It was a much better time on that website when it was still niche and felt (at least to me) like a "real community". There is a comment here that I regularly look back at as it remains evergreen: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31363953 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31363953 > My take is, if a community is constrained by quality (eg moderation, self-selecting invite-only etc) then the only way it grows is by lowering the threshold. Inevitably that means lower quality content. > To some extent, more people can make up for it. Eg if I go from 10 excellent artists to 1000 good ones, chances are that the top 10% artwork created actually gets better. > But eventually if you grow by lowering quality, then, well, quality drops. > I suppose for very small societies, they may be limited by discoverability/cliquiness and not quality, so their growth doesn’t mesh with quality and so they could also get better with size. > Note, “quality” doesn’t have to mean good/bad but also just “property”. When Facebook started, it was for kids from elite schools. It then gradually diluted that by lowering that particular bar. Then it was for kids from all schools. Then young people. Then their parents too. Clearly, it’s far from dying in absolute terms, but it’s certainly no longer what it initially was. To many initial users, it’s as good as dead though.
- wkat4242 2y ago
  Uhh no I don't remember the jerky thing but I guess that was US only. We don't even have beef jerky in these parts (save for import stores) But yeah it was a better time.

stevenicr 2y ago

1st ddg result shows /post/151 and that page is a cloudflare 504 gateway timeout page. Maybe too many people have already discovered it.

wkat4242 2y ago
It's working fine, https://lemmynsfw.com/ https://lemmynsfw.com/ (note: obviously very NSFW!) Maybe they are blocking crawlers or something.

dannyphantom 2y ago

Do you remember when buying Reddit gold gave you a coupon to buy beef jerky on that one website? It was a much better time on that website when it was still niche and felt (at least to me) like a "real community". There is a comment here that I regularly look back at as it remains evergreen: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31363953 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31363953 > My take is, if a community is constrained by quality (eg moderation, self-selecting invite-only etc) then the only way it grows is by lowering the threshold. Inevitably that means lower quality content. > To some extent, more people can make up for it. Eg if I go from 10 excellent artists to 1000 good ones, chances are that the top 10% artwork created actually gets better. > But eventually if you grow by lowering quality, then, well, quality drops. > I suppose for very small societies, they may be limited by discoverability/cliquiness and not quality, so their growth doesn’t mesh with quality and so they could also get better with size. > Note, “quality” doesn’t have to mean good/bad but also just “property”. When Facebook started, it was for kids from elite schools. It then gradually diluted that by lowering that particular bar. Then it was for kids from all schools. Then young people. Then their parents too. Clearly, it’s far from dying in absolute terms, but it’s certainly no longer what it initially was. To many initial users, it’s as good as dead though.

wkat4242 2y ago
Uhh no I don't remember the jerky thing but I guess that was US only. We don't even have beef jerky in these parts (save for import stores) But yeah it was a better time.