4 ms·

I find it more disturbing that her private, offline conversations are being policed at all.

• abeppu 2y ago
  ... is it offline? Is the whole product a use-based API (which might be related to why the voice is slow and she doesn't use it that often)?
• duxup 2y ago
  Most of these AI products are online and sent over the network to generate the response.
  • deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
  • wrs 2y ago
    So is iMessage. Putting some processing elsewhere on the network doesn’t change the fact that a conversation between spouses (or any other utterances of a person, for that matter) should be private.
    • duxup 2y ago
      If you have AI process it .. is it private?
      • wrs 2y ago
        Well, that's up to the service provider (just like messaging).
  • Quarondeau 2y ago
    That's true, but those safeguards can be disabled. ChatGPT on Azure for example, allows Azure account managers to disable filters/safeguards depending on the customer. Given that this product is apparently used to give people with disabilities a voice, that should definitely qualify. Yes of course they should be able to swear, just like everyone else.
• DiscourseFan 2y ago
  "I'm sorry, Karen. I'm afraid I can't do that."
• GJim 2y ago
  Posts made amongst closed groups of friends on social media are now routinely policed by tech companies for "bad" words. Frankly, I find it "regarded" such puritanism is tolerated.