3 ms·

How does this compare to / differ from https://github.com/yamadashy/repomix https://github.com/yamadashy/repomix ?

• akoculu 2y ago
  or https://github.com/azer/llmcat https://github.com/azer/llmcat
  • imdsm 2y ago
    I simply have a bash script called printall which takes in some args, and outputs markdown codeblocks with filenames and a tree. One of hundreds of scripts built up over the years.
    • akoculu 2y ago
      if you add fzf to speed up file / folder selection, you'll have your own llmcat :)
• ycombinatornews 2y ago
  My question exactly. Repomix seems to be tested util for something like that.
• apineda 2y ago
  There is also https://github.com/regenrek/codefetch https://github.com/regenrek/codefetch which I personally like
• ActVen 2y ago
  Same question here. I have found repomix to get the job done really well.
• tesserato 2y ago
  Some advantages of CodeWeaver are that it is compiled, so it might be faster; you can grab a compatible executable from the releases section instead of using `go install` so, no dependencies. You can manually specify what to exclude via a comma-separated list of regular expressions so it might be more flexible. I never used Repomix so, those assumptions might not hold. On the other hand, remix seems to be awfully more complete, a full-fledged solution to convert source code to monolithic representations. I wrote CodeWeaver because I only needed something that worked and, occasionally, I could trust to keep sensitive data away from sketchy LLMs (And wasn't aware of other solutions).
• SillyUsername 2y ago
  or https://github.com/bodo-run/yek https://github.com/bodo-run/yek