4 ms·
Does not see anything that os larger than the field of view? I can’t conceptualise this. How? Surely this is the same as humans where if you had a big enough u
by pinoy420 2y ago
Does not see anything that os larger than the field of view?
I can’t conceptualise this. How? Surely this is the same as humans where if you had a big enough uniformly lit object in front of you, you couldn’t “see” it?
- davedx 2y agoImagine if you only see things if you can see their edges. (most eyes do edge detection in the retina before signals hit the visual cortex)
- p0w3n3d 2y agoat least the model we used was behaving like this. It was making objects larger than it visible as a line and smaller visible as a whole (like coloring fill in MS Paint). Objects that fit in the eye were colored and larger were not. However this was a neural network model (shown in excel as a matrix) - I wonder where did he get it from. When I wrote the above, I tried to find it but couldn't