Yeah, I would assume that there's still beef between both parties, and I can kind of understand that. If you're getting a cease and desist letter because of som

Yeah, I would assume that there's still beef between both parties, and I can kind of understand that. If you're getting a cease and desist letter because of some trademark bullshit for your open source forks... then I'd be pissed too. The way Oracle treated the developer community was pretty insane to be honest. Some links for others to read-up: Press Announcement for "Oracle Open Office" which wasn't open anymore: - https://web.archive.org/web/20101217212955/https://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/195766 https://web.archive.org/web/20101217212955/https://www.oracl... Oracle trying to upsell Standard Editions and Enterprise Editions: - https://web.archive.org/web/20100924092655/http://www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/open-office/open-office-170241.html https://web.archive.org/web/20100924092655/http://www.oracle... Announcement of the Document Foundation (Oct 2010, before Oracle's announcement in Dec 2010): - https://web.archive.org/web/20101001004543/http://www.documentfoundation.org/faq https://web.archive.org/web/20101001004543/http://www.docume... IBM being the reason that Oracle donates Open Office to Apache Foundation due to them pointing out to Oracle that their copyleft license agreement with Sun invalidates Oracle's proprietary claims: - https://web.archive.org/web/20131207051759/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-splits-and-pirouettes-1270296.html https://web.archive.org/web/20131207051759/http://www.h-onli... - https://web.archive.org/web/20110603142320/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-the-heck-is-happening-with-openoffice-update/9025 https://web.archive.org/web/20110603142320/http://www.zdnet....