4 ms·
You may want to review the author's background before dismissing their points for not being in a shiny deck. I guess your point about it feeling handcrafted ho
by _kb 2y ago
You may want to review the author's background before dismissing their points for not being in a shiny deck.
I guess your point about it feeling handcrafted holds, if you count the character encoding.
- shever73 2y ago> I guess your point about it feeling handcrafted holds, if you count the character encoding. Magnificent!
- hulitu 2y ago> You may want to review the author's background before dismissing their points for not being in a shiny deck. Well, Wikipedia presents him as the author of Go, so the OP might have a point. /s OTOH not knowing about Rob Pike and programming in UNIX, sounds strange.
- jillesvangurp 2y agoThe argument should hold regardless of who a person is or what they did. I commented being ignorant of this person's reputation and achievements. But so what? It shouldn't matter. I'm targeting the argument, not the person. I still think his slides aren't great. I wasn't dismissing his weak analysis because of the deck but making the point that he's weakening his own argument with it. And since his points specifically include a lot of comments about the modern web, complete with a rant about frames per second, I think it's a fair point to make.