At no point did I suggest he was doing something that wasn't voted for. I merely suggested that what was happening seemed at odds with the intent of the founde

At no point did I suggest he was doing something that wasn't voted for. I merely suggested that what was happening seemed at odds with the intent of the founders of the United States, in that even in 18th century England it would have been perceived as vast over-reach of a monarch to behave in a similar manner. If you're all happy with it, fine. It just seems remarkable, hence my original comment.