But the training data isn't open... I agree that open source doesn't mean open assets, but neither does open assets mean open source. You could make a linguist

But the training data isn't open... I agree that open source doesn't mean open assets, but neither does open assets mean open source. You could make a linguistic argument that the training data is part of the "source" of the model (as in, from whence it came), but in any case the point is moot because neither the training data nor the code is open.