3 ms·
I'm all for acknowledging that we are at the bottom of the slippery slope and have been for some time but I think people should be focusing on what they can do
by yieldcrv 2y ago
I'm all for acknowledging that we are at the bottom of the slippery slope and have been for some time
but I think people should be focusing on what they can do with it, people put their energy into arguing about it or these semantical distinctions
when the reality is that we will have this supreme court, or its rulings, for the next 50 years at least. like, okay, work with that
you don't love all federal agencies, only some. so instead of lamenting the ones you find beneficial, focus on the ones you hate and Chevron the shit out of them. sure, go ahead and start with obscure regulations that moderately inconvenience you, but go further and get their entire charter declared unconstitutional, shoot, get the interstate commerce clause interpretation adjusted if that's what you feel like. we know what this supreme court is going to do, stop worrying about whether you agree and worry about how you can use it, for example
I don't know why people use their energy any other way, this is the most egalitarian Oligarch-level event in history.
- fckdt 2y ago[dead]
- maeil 2y agoYou still don't get it, and aren't acknowledging the bottom of the slippery slope. You're part of the group I was targeting. Laws have been shown to now be entirely meaningless, yet you continue to suggest energy should be put into going through the courts. That's the whole point, this entire action entirely ignores both Congress and SCOTUS, the law doesn't matter.
- yieldcrv 2y agoI wasn’t referring to this case I was referring to navigating the structure of the country, yourself, not as the president
- mschoch 2y agoseriously dude, it's over, go home.
- yieldcrv 2y agojust beginning for me, I've got some agency guidance to get rescinded, as well as some EO's to try to get the President to create and sign